https://journals.academicianstudies.com/jimra/issue/feed Journal of International Management Research and Applications 2026-06-30T13:47:17+00:00 Veciye Taşcı vtasci@gtu.edu.tr Open Journal Systems <p class="xmsonormal">Journal of International Management Research and Applications (JIMRA) is an international, open-access and double blind peer-reviewed journal that aims to contribute to the theory and practice by including original studies in the field of management, business, economics, organizational behavior and social sciences. The journal publishes theoretical and/or applied studies that contribute to the field. JIMRA started to be published in 2022, and it is published twice a year in June and December. The publication languages of the journal are Turkish and English. The journal does not apply any application nor publication fee, and it follows open access policy. </p> <p class="xmsonormal">eISSN: 2980-0528</p> <p data-path-to-node="3,0"><strong data-path-to-node="3,0" data-index-in-node="0">Open Access Statement</strong></p> <p class="xmsonormal">JIMRA is an open access journal. All published content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits users to use, share, and adapt the material for non-commercial purposes, provided that proper attribution is given.</p> https://journals.academicianstudies.com/jimra/article/view/512 The Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics on Work Outcomes A Comparative and Moderating Analysis Across Generations X and Y 2026-06-15T08:57:10+00:00 Onur Yaman yaya.6750@gmail.com Kültigin Akçin kakcin@gtu.edu.tr <p>This study investigates how perceived organizational politics (POP) is associated with four work outcomes—job stress, job satisfaction, cyberloafing, and self-efficacy—among Generation X and Generation Y employees. It also examines whether the two generational cohorts differ in the study variables and whether generation conditions the relationships between POP and work outcomes. Using a quantitative, cross-sectional, correlational, and comparative design, data were collected from 312 white-collar employees working in manufacturing firms in Istanbul and Kocaeli, Türkiye. The sample included 123 Generation X and 189 Generation Y employees. The data were analyzed through reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis, descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, simple regression analysis, independent samples t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and interaction-based moderation analysis. The findings show that POP positively predicts job stress and cyberloafing, whereas it negatively predicts job satisfaction and self-efficacy. Generation-based comparisons indicate that Generation Y employees report higher levels of job satisfaction and cyberloafing than Generation X employees; however, no significant differences emerge for POP, job stress, or self-efficacy. Moderation analyses reveal that generation does not significantly moderate the relationships between POP and job stress, job satisfaction, or cyberloafing. The only significant interaction is observed for self-efficacy, indicating that the negative association between POP and self-efficacy is stronger among Generation Y employees. By examining attitudinal, behavioral, and psychological outcomes in a single framework, the study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how politically perceived organizational environments are related to employee responses across generational cohorts.</p> 2026-06-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of International Management Research and Applications https://journals.academicianstudies.com/jimra/article/view/516 Strategic Management: Theoretical Evolution, Core Frameworks, And Contemporary Frontiers 2026-06-17T11:33:52+00:00 Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu ysbalcioglu@dogus.edu.tr Ümit Bayraktar umitbayraktar@gtu.edu.tr <p>Strategic management research has evolved through multiple theoretical perspectives that offer complementary explanations of how firms create, capture, and renew competitive advantage. This study provides an integrative thematic review of the field’s intellectual development, focusing on the transition from the design and positioning schools to the resource-based view, dynamic capabilities, and contemporary approaches centred on artificial intelligence, digital transformation, platform ecosystems, and sustainability. The review draws on searches conducted in Scopus and Web of Science covering peer-reviewed articles, books, and book chapters published between 1959 and mid-2026. Approximately 340 records were screened, of which 26 theoretically central and directly relevant sources were retained for thematic synthesis. The findings indicate that industry positioning, firm-specific resources, and dynamic capabilities should not be treated as competing explanations of superior performance. Rather, they form an interconnected system in which firms identify attractive competitive positions, deploy valuable and difficult-to-imitate resources, and continuously reconfigure those resources as environmental conditions change. Building on this synthesis, the study identifies three increasingly prominent frontiers AI-enabled strategic decision-making, ecosystem-based digital competition, and ESG-oriented strategy and explains how they extend established theories of competitive advantage. The review contributes by presenting an integrative framework that links external positioning, internal resource orchestration, and strategic renewal, while outlining research questions concerning AI governance, ecosystem dependence, digital capability development, and the conditions under which sustainability capabilities generate durable advantage.</p> 2026-06-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of International Management Research and Applications